|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum Reverberation Project
1012
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 17:25:38 -
[1] - Quote
CCP, I just want to say THANK YOU, and that you have TOTALLY REGAINED my respect. For once in this world, Integrity trumped the Almighty Dollar. I never thought Id see it.
MAD props to you, CCP. You got ballz, you got heart, you got my non-isboxing 5 accounts for a long time to come 
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum Reverberation Project
1015
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 17:37:44 -
[2] - Quote
DragonHelm III wrote:padraig animal wrote:Radkiel wrote:[quote=Gina Taroen]lol wonder how many people will quit because of this :D I just unsubbed all of my accounts, I'll play until the 1st then find another game.  I fail to see how multiboxing affects anyone around me. Why tell us you just unsubbed no-one here cares just leave quietly.
Oh no, I don't want them to leave quietly, I want to savor every single tear! CRY MOAR BITCHES!!

\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum Reverberation Project
1027
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 00:43:51 -
[3] - Quote
Steppa Musana wrote:CCP can save almost the entirety of their mining alt ISBox subscriptions by allowing us to jettison cargo or move cargo to an Orca using broadcasting. Without that ability it's too much of a hassle to mine and I personally will be retiring my entire fleet over it. 
Awesome! Dont let the door hit ya in the arse on the way out!      
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
1031
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 09:47:23 -
[4] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Here's a tl;dr for you, since you won't take the valuable time out of your life to read the discussion that led up to this anyway: there's no way for CCP to detect these forms of input multiplication. Do you even begin to comprehend how absurdly invasive it would be to put software that can do this into their game?
I don't, so why don't you spell it out for me? I know a good 15 yrs ago or so EQ implemented a method of detecting cheating programs that were being run. There wasn't a whole lot of hoopla over it by the playerbase, either.
So, how "absurdly invasive" would these measures have to be?
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
1031
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 10:02:12 -
[5] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Your "developer mind" has completely skipped over the specific example that I have brought up, in which there is only ONE total window at play. One account, one character. We're talking about the difference between physically pressing 4 keys on the keyboard, and doing the same with the press of just one key, which standard, common keyboard/mouse drivers, such as those made by Logitech and Razer, can make happen.
mfw not a single person throwing blind support at this decision actually reads anything aside from "BANBANBAN *emoticons"
omg d00d, what if I pass out drunk here at my desk... and my face slams into the keyboard.. and it, like, activates all my mods at once??? oh shitzkees....
Seriously, do you realize how pathetic your arguments of minutia look to everyone else? You're not even arguing about what the rule is all about.
Here, have a Tic Tac. 
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
1038
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 16:13:53 -
[6] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:All this means is that CCP will have to find another subversive way to get rid of suicide-ganking when people get around this change, and they will. However, the precedent of bias toward various forms of alt usage will be set by then.
Edit: and now I realize that this could easily be done in a way that only requires one key press for each client, which can be the same key, while still being 100% within the confines of the new rules. GG CCP.
Edit #2: I can tab through 10 EVE clients in just slightly over 1 second without any lag whatsoever.
I see youre still in denial today. Youve now moved on to "well this wasnt really about us, it was about suicide ganking..."
Apparently you never read CCP's stance on suicide ganking:
Why should CCP provide protection for your haulage in high sec?
CONCORD offer a level of deterrent just the same as any law enforcement agency, but as with any police for they're reactive and punitive rather than proactive.
If you want your haulage to be safer, bring the guns. If you don't have any guns, sacrifice some of your profit margin and hire someone who has them to escort you.
Welcome to New Eden, you just learned a very valuable lesson in being prepared and covering your back.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4958992#post4958992
That's not the only post we've seen Falcon make about suicide ganking, but I CBA to find the rest. I'm sure you get the point.
Thank you. Try again.
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
1047
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 20:58:25 -
[7] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:white male privilege wrote:if the multiboxer continues mining after the plex requirement is met, he starts making ten times what someone in a solo miner will You're saying that as if ISBoxer is some kind of special privilege that's only available to the select few Chosen Ones or something. As much as I think that alt play should have never been a thing from the beginning, the matter of the fact is that it is, and always has been, available to everyone. It's a potential that everyone is able to unlock, but few choose to do so, much in the same way that making much more money via scamming and trading is possible when compared to mining and mission-running. By your logic, we should penalize the scammers and traders because they make the same money as miners or missioners in a fraction of the time, and can use the remainder of their time to make more.
No. Scamming = Not against the rules. Multiplexing = Against the rules.
"Logic." 
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
1048
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 22:52:29 -
[8] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:2014 the year of the tears
Tears of FW farmers ( with the dps check on NPC in plexes) :) Tears of insta jumper all over the map in 2 minutes :) Tears of i can control 15 accounts with one mouse and one keyboard..
I'm telling you the year of Tears
if i've forgotten some TEARS please remind me :)
It's GLORIOUS, isn't it??   
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
1048
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 22:53:35 -
[9] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:Radkiel wrote:Revman Zim wrote:To all the players threatening to unsub their 2 dozen accounts because they can't cheat anymore with ISBoxer, realize that no one cares.
Your accounts do nothing for the game. They do not independently interact with game or other players. As it has been already pointed out, the PLEX used for those accounts will still be in the game and cash in CCP's wallet. Your presence is not needed for EVE to survive and prosper. In fact, with you gone the game is immediately better.
In order for a threat to work you have to be worth something to someone. ISBoxers have no value except to themselves. So you stopped by to tell us you don't care? Typical ISBoxer reply. Cherry-pick a phrase and twist. I believe wrote that NO ONE cares if they unsub their accounts. But I will clarify. No one cares that YOU will be unsubbbing your accounts. You add nothing to the game and YOU and the rest of your ilk will not be missed. Your leaving will have no negative impact on EVE Online or CCP's finances. You have zero worth to the EVE Universe.
Here here!
Good riddance to bad rubbish!
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
1048
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 00:25:54 -
[10] - Quote
Nolak Ataru wrote:Volcane Nephilim wrote:Yi Hyori wrote: . As for those over privileged players arguing against multiboxing, needs to take a strong look at their arguments. Are you arguing because you truly feel that multiboxing in its truest form is ( ie having more than 1 client open at a time ) is actually cheating or if your argument is solely based on the premise that "if i cant have it no one else can" mentality. . TLDR; There isn't one. Read the post.
Read the OP. You can multibox all you want, people do not want to stop multi boxing. You can even multi box with this tool in question - it's not being banned. What you cannot do is broadcast actions. That's all. Indeed, read the post. If you aren't a multiboxer, you don't understand the trouble we've had in dealing with GMs and Devs who are ignorant of how it works (Seagull, my offer still stands on us sitting down and I'll explain how hard it is to multibox.) not to mention the difficulty of setting up ISBoxer. ISBoxer isn't a set of snow tires you pop onto your car and suddenly you can drive no problem in the snow. There are hundreds of settings you have to tweak and modify in order to get it to work. It's closer to building your own car from scratch starting with nothing but an engine and a set of wheels. Sure, you can weld something together that would look like it's the car from Half Life 2, and it'll work. Or you can spend more time and effort on it and it'll look like a Ferrari. The problem is, everyone's looking at the Ferrari and saying that you only spent the time and effort you would have on the HL2 car. I see this same argument coming from left-wing gun nuts. You take one radical example (an assault rifle used in the military) and apply that to everything that fires bullets (hunting rifles used for putting meat on the table, pistols for self defense, shotguns for clay shooting.) I challenge ANY CCP DEV OR GM to sit down with me and my friends, and we can discuss how hard it is to setup one of those videos you see on youtube of the guy running 12 Nightmares and a Basi.
So what you're saying is that because it's hard to get your cheat set up, it's not cheating. Gotcha. 
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|
|
|
|
|